Practical PMS guidance for FDA and Health Canada first — with selected global reference content where useful. Written from the RA/QA perspective.
Importers, distributors, procurement, supplier-quality, and RA/QA teams often want a dated public-source record before placing a PO or reordering a medical device SKU. Here's what FDA and Health Canada publish, what a useful pre-PO snapshot looks like, and what the check is not.
By TrueMedDevice Team · Apr 01, 2026 · 5 min read | Today's 10,384 signals reveal that software-related malfunctions and supply chain quality issues are the primary drivers of post-market risk, demanding immediate cross-functional action to build audit-ready evidence.
An OrthAlign knee-system recall does not prove the same defect in another product, but it does justify a documented orthopedic workflow assessment instead of premature closure.
If you manufacture electrosurgical instruments or any device with welded metal components from external suppliers, this recall creates a specific question: could the same supplier validation gap exist in your supply chain?
If you manufacture electrosurgical instruments or any device with welded metal components from external suppliers, this recall creates a specific question: could the same supplier validation gap exist in your supply chain?
By TrueMedDevice Team · Mar 29, 2026 · 5 min read | Today's 26,202 signals reveal systemic quality control breakdowns in third-party servicing and persistent software-related malfunctions in connected devices.
Pulse oximeters are among the most widely used medical monitoring devices, yet they are associated with multiple regulatory events. This article analyzes the regulatory landscape including 510(k) clearances, recall trends, MAUDE data, and what RAQA teams should monitor.
A Jira board is not a DHF. Email threads are not design reviews. Learn the 10-step design control workflow, QMSR changes, and how to build a Design History File that survives FDA inspection.
Engineering finds a field problem. Is it a correction, removal, or recall? Learn the 21 CFR 806 decision tree, health hazard evaluation process, and what happens when you miss the 10-day reporting window.
Three CAPAs. Same root cause. No trending analysis. Major nonconformity. Learn why CAPA trending is mandatory, what auditors look for, and the 10-step workflow that prevents repeat findings.
The most common mistake in medical device risk management: using FMEA Risk Priority Numbers for ISO 14971 risk evaluation. Here is why Detection is not a risk factor, what auditors look for, and what real FDA enforcement data shows.
Here's what's happening right now: 391 new FDA recalls were posted this week, with 5 new Health Canada recalls. The dialysis convenience kit category shows multiple signals, including Medline's ADD A CATH DIALYSIS KIT and Centurion's CENTRAL LINE INSERTION TRAY, both citing silicone seal failures that could occlude fluid paths. Meanwhile, Edermy LLC's PIE PAK and PIE Trolley System recalls highlight 510(k) clearance issues, and orthopedic implants from Enovis face labeling errors. For your boar
Here's what's happening right now: 391 new FDA recalls were issued this week, including 5 in convenience kits for dialysis maintenance where silicone seal failures could occlude fluid paths. Health Canada added 5 more recalls, with issues ranging from labeling errors to unauthorized devices. In total, today alone brought 26,590 new regulatory signals across FDA and Health Canada databases. For RA Managers focused on audit preparedness and QMSR compliance, this data highlights critical patterns.
By TrueMedDevice Team · Feb 25, 2026 · 5 min read | Today's 1,010 signals expose critical audit risks where high-volume adverse events for active implantables may indicate inadequate trending and cross-jurisdictional alignment in post-market surveillance systems.
By TrueMedDevice Team · Feb 24, 2026 · 5 min read | Today's data reveals a critical pattern: reprocessed single-use devices and software-driven systems are driving enforcement and adverse events, demanding immediate supplier oversight and design control updates.
By TrueMedDevice Team · Feb 20, 2026 · 5 min read | Today's 158 FDA enforcement actions expose critical gaps in supplier qualification, sterile barrier validation, and design verification that cascade into recalls and adverse events.
Competitor recall monitoring explained at 4 levels — from playground analogy to strategic intelligence. Covers which databases to monitor, how to evaluate each signal, the regulatory requirement from EU MDR and FDA, and practical solutions for automated monitoring.
The exact questions FDA inspectors, EU Notified Body auditors, and MDSAP auditors ask about your PMS system — explained at 4 levels. Includes the 8 documents to have ready, the 'thread-pull' technique inspectors use, and how pre-inspection intelligence targets your weak spots.
Adverse event reporting explained at 4 levels — from simple analogy to multi-jurisdiction filing strategy. Includes the exact reporting timelines for FDA, EU MDR, Health Canada, Japan, Australia, and China, plus the reportability decision tree every RA/QA professional needs.
Post-market surveillance explained at 4 levels — from a 5-year-old's analogy to top researcher analysis. Covers why PMS exists, what RA/QA professionals must do daily, the regulations across FDA/EU/HC, and where the field is heading with RWE and AI signal detection.
Enter your device and see what needs review